Gap widens between good and bad performers in Africa;

The 2011 Arab Spring did not spill over into
sub-Saharan Africa to the point of bringing down any governments, but some
regimes had to face forceful political and social demands, and journalists
covering demonstrations were often the victims of indiscriminate police
repression or were targeted by police who did not want them covering the
crackdown.

This was the case in Angola (132nd),
where many journalists were arrested during protests in September, and in Uganda (139th),
which fell 43 places in the index after a year that will not be forgotten by
its media. They were the targets of violence and surveillance during the
presidential election in February and were targeted again during the brutal
crackdown on the “Walk to Work” protests later in the year, when dozens of
journalists were arrested.

It was even worse in Malawi (146th),
which plunged 67 places in the index, the biggest fall of any country in the
world. Malawi’s journalists were treated like demonstrators during the
crackdown on protests in the summer. Many were arrested and mistreated, and
equipment was broken. A student and blogger, Robert Chasowa,
who was found dead in September, was almost certainly murdered. Media that
wanted to investigate the case were threatened. Before all this, Malawi’s media
legislation had been toughened so much at the start of the year that some
European partners suspended part of their aid.

Closed and authoritarian countries near bottom of
index

Reporters Without Borders
regards the situation in Rwanda (156th) and Equatorial
Guinea (161st) as very grave because of the control that their
governments exercise over the media and freedom of expression in general. They
have been joined by Djibouti (159th), which fell 49 places.
Its president, Ismael Omar Guelleh, was returned to
office at the start of 2011 in an election that was decided in advance and gave
the opposition no possibility of expressing itself in the media. There is no
free press, six people who provide an exile radio station with information were
jailed for four months, and social networks are closely monitored to ensure
that there are no protests.

The presence of Côte d’Ivoire in this
same group of countries (sharing 159th position with Djibouti) could be
misleading. Côte d’Ivoire has real media, unlike Guelleh’s
Djibouti or Teodoro Obiang Nguema’s Equatorial Guinea, and they say what they think,
unlike the media in Paul Kagame’s Rwanda, which have
little freedom of expression. Côte d’Ivoire’s poor ranking reflects the dramatic
impact that the post-election crisis had on the media in the first half of
2011, including harassment of all kinds, acts of violence and the murders of a
journalist and a media worker. During the battle of Abidjan at the start of
April, it was impossible for a journalist venture out into the city.

Violence, censorship and prison give East Africa three
worst rankings

The three worst sub-Saharan rankings are all to be
found in East Africa. Year after year, journalists continue to be exposed to
the chaos and anarchy in Somalia (164th), a country embroiled
in civil war and without a stable government since 1991. Four journalists were
killed in Mogadishu in 2011. The bad ranking assigned to Omar al-Bashir’s Sudan (170th)
was due to prior censorship, closures of newspapers, and arrests, prolonged
detention and mistreatment of journalists.

Finally, Eritrea (179th) came last in
the index for the fifth year running. Freedom of opinion, like all the other
freedoms, does not exist under the totalitarian dictatorship that President Issaias Afeworki has imposed on
this Horn of Africa country. At least 30 journalists are currently detained in
appalling conditions. Some have been held for more than 10 years.

At the other end of the index, several African countries
made significant progress or showed that respect for freedom of information has
taken a firm hold in their societies.

Good countries group gets bigger

The number of African countries that are in the top 50
of the index has risen from seven last year to nine this year, while the number
that are in top 100 has risen from 24 to 27. The
highest non-European country in the index is an African one and in fact it is
in the top 10. It is Cape Verde (9th), a healthy democracy and
model of good governance, where governments can be changed through the ballot
box, as last summer’s presidential election again showed. Journalists there are
completely free and all the political parties have access to the state
media. Namibia (20th) also has an excellent ranking, better
than Japan or the United Kingdom, for example.

Botswana (42nd), which rose 20 places, and Comoros (45th), which
rose 25 places, are now jostling Mali (25th) and Ghana (41st),
Africa’s traditional leaders in respect for journalists.

A spectacular jump and other notable improvements

Niger (29th) rose
75 places in the index, the biggest leap by any country in the world this year.
The economic environment for Niger’s media is very precarious but they are free
and benefit from favourable legislation. Media freedom violations have
virtually disappeared. The improvement has been seen in both concrete and
symbolic measures. At the end of 2011, Mahamadou Issoufou, who was elected president in the spring, became
the first African head of state to sign the Declaration of Table Mountain,
thereby undertaking to promote media freedom.

Other African leaders could follow suit, such as
Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, the president of Mauritania (67th),
which rose 28 places thanks to the adoption of a law
on the electronic media, the opening up of the broadcasting sector, and other
developments. Its progress needs to be confirmed.

Cameroon (97th) fell sharply in 2010
because of the journalist Bibi Ngota’s
death in detention but recovered a respectable ranking in 2011 although light
has yet to be shed on all aspects of his death and on the death in November of
this year of Reporters Without Borders correspondent
Jules Koum Koum, a
journalist who wrote about corruption. Cameroon also badly needs to
decriminalize media offences and modernize its communication law. Madagascar (84th)
continued to improve for the second year running after plummeting in 2009
because of that year’s political crisis but, 2012, as an election year, will
pose challenges.

Soft underbelly

The absence of major incidents involving the media
allowed Senegal (75th) to rise 18
places but the situation is fragile one month ahead of a presidential election
that is likely to be tense. Like their Cameroonian counterparts, the Senegalese
authorities are still not ready to protect journalists from prison sentences by
decriminalizing media offences. Aside from abusive lawsuits, Liberia (110th)
usually allows its media a great deal of freedom but it fell 26 places this
year because journalists were attacked and media were closed during the
presidential election in October and November, when challenger Winston Tubman
boycotted the run-off against the incumbent, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.

South Sudan (111th),
which became independent on 9 July, entered the index with a respectable
ranking. The challenge for this country is to build a solid and viable state in
a very unstable region while guaranteeing freedom of expression. It must make
every effort to avoid sinking to the level of its neighbours.

In the rest of the world

Crackdowns on protests cause big changes to index
positions

Syria, Bahrain and Yemen get worst ever rankings

“This year’s index sees many changes in the rankings,
changes that reflect a year that was incredibly rich in developments,
especially in the Arab world,” Reporters Without
Borders said today as it released its 10th annual press freedom index. “Many
media paid dearly for their coverage of democratic aspirations or opposition
movements. Control of news and information continued to tempt governments and
to be a question of survival for totalitarian and repressive regimes. The past
year also highlighted the leading role played by netizens
in producing and disseminating news.

“Crackdown was the word of the year in
2011. Never has freedom of information been so closely associated with
democracy. Never have journalists, through their reporting, vexed the enemies
of freedom so much. Never have acts of censorship and physical attacks on
journalists seemed so numerous. The equation is simple: the absence or
suppression of civil liberties leads necessarily to the suppression of media
freedom. Dictatorships fear and ban information, especially when it may
undermine them.

“It is no surprise that the same trio of countries,
Eritrea, Turkmenistan and North Korea, absolute dictatorships that permit no
civil liberties, again occupy the last three places in the index. This year,
they are immediately preceded at the bottom by Syria, Iran and China, three
countries that seem to have lost contact with reality as they have been sucked
into an insane spiral of terror, and by Bahrain and Vietnam, quintessential
oppressive regimes. Other countries such as Uganda and Belarus have also become
much more repressive.

“This year’s index finds the same group of countries
at its head, countries such as Finland, Norway and Netherlands that respect
basic freedoms. This serves as a reminder that media independence can only be
maintained in strong democracies and that democracy needs media freedom. It is
worth noting the entry of Cape Verde and Namibia into the top twenty, two
African countries where no attempts to obstruct the media were reported in
2011.”

Protest movements

The Arab world was the motor of history in 2011 but
the Arab uprisings have had contrasting political outcomes so far, with Tunisia
and Bahrain at opposite ends of the scale. Tunisia (134th) rose
30 places in index and, with much suffering, gave birth to a democratic regime
that has not yet fully accepted a free and independent press. Bahrain (173rd)
fell 29 places because of its relentless crackdown on pro-democracy movements,
its trials of human rights defenders and its suppression of all space for
freedom.

While Libya (154th) turned the page on the Gaddafi
era, Yemen succumbed to violence between President Ali Abdallah
Saleh’s opponents and supporters and languished in
171st position. The future of both of these countries remains uncertain, and
the place they will allow the media is undecided. The same goes for Egypt,
which fell 39 places to 166th because the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces,
in power since February, dashed the hopes of democrats by continuing the
Mubarak dictatorship’s practices. There were three periods of exceptional
violence for journalists: in February, November and December.

Already poorly ranked in 2010, Syria fell further in
the index, to 176th position, because total censorship, widespread
surveillance, indiscriminate violence and government manipulation made it
impossible for journalists to work.

Elsewhere in the world, pro-democracy movements that
tried to follow the Arab example were ruthlessly suppressed. Many arrests were
made in Vietnam (172nd). In China (174th), the government responded to regional
and local protests and to public impatience with scandals and acts of injustice
by feverishly reinforcing its system of controlling news and information,
carrying out extrajudicial arrests and stepping up Internet censorship. There
was a dramatic rise in the number of arrests in Azerbaijan (162nd), where Ilham Aliyev’s autocratic
government did not hesitate to jail netizens, abduct
opposition journalists and bar foreign reporters in order to impose a news
blackout on the unrest.

Led by President Yoweri Museveni, Uganda (139th) launched an unprecedented
crackdown on opposition movements and independent media after the elections in
February. Similarly, Chile (80th) fell 47 places because of its many freedom of information violations, committed very often
by the security forces during student protests. The United States (47th) also
owed its fall of 27 places to the many arrests of journalist covering Occupy
Wall Street protests.

Several European countries fall far behind rest of
continent

The index has highlighted the divergence of some
European countries from the rest of the continent. The crackdown on protests
after President Lukashenko’s reelection
caused Belarus to fall 14 places to 168th. At a time when it is portraying
itself as a regional model, Turkey (148th) took a big step backwards and lost
10 places. Far from carrying out promised reforms, the judicial system launched
a wave of arrests of journalists that was without precedent since the military
dictatorship.

Within the European Union, the index reflects a
continuation of the very marked distinction between countries such as Finland
and Netherlands that have always had a good evaluation and countries such as
Bulgaria (80th), Greece (70th) and Italy (61st) that fail to address the issue
of their media freedom violations, above all because of a lack of political
will. There was little progress from France, which went from 44th to 38th, or from Spain (39th) and Romania (47th). Media freedom
is a challenge that needs addressing more than ever in the Balkans, which want to join the European Union but are suffering the
negative effects of the economic crisis.

Endemic violence

Many countries are marked by a culture of violence
towards the media that has taken a deep hold. It will be hard to reverse the
trends in these countries without an effective fight against impunity. Mexico
(149th) and Honduras (135th) are two cases in point. Pakistan (151st) was the
world’s deadliest country for journalists for the second year running. Somalia
(164th), which has been at war for 20 years, shows no sign of finding a way out
of the chaos in which journalists are paying a heavy price.

In Iran (175th), hounding and humiliating journalists
has been part of officialdom’s political culture for years. The regime feeds on
persecution of the media. Iraq (152nd) fell back 22 places and is now
worryingly approaching its 2008 position (158th).

Noteworthy changes

South Sudan, a new nation facing many challenges, has
entered the index in a respectable position (111th) for what is a breakaway
from one of the worst ranked countries, Sudan (170th). Burma (169th) has a
slightly better position than in previous years as a result of political
changes in recent months that have raised hopes but need to be confirmed. Niger
(29th) achieved the biggest rise in a single year, 75 places, thanks to a
successful political transition.

It was Africa that also saw the biggest falls in the
index. Djibouti, a discreet little dictatorship in the Horn of Africa, fell 49
places to 159th. Malawi (146th) fell 67 places because of the totalitarian
tendencies of its president, Bingu Wa Mutharika.
Uganda, mentioned above, fell 43 places to 139th. Finally, Côte d’Ivoire fell
41 places to 159th because the media were badly hit by the fighting between the
supporters of rival presidents Laurent Gbagbo and Alassane Ouattara.

The biggest fall in Latin America was by Brazil, which
plunged 41 places to 99th because the high level of violence resulted in the
deaths of three journalists and bloggers.