For months, that dilemma has loomed over governments and economists as they struggled to put out a debt-fueled economic wildfire that has threatened banks, wiped out jobs and toppled governments all over Europe. But on Tuesday, presidents and prime ministers meeting in this seaside resort seemed content to delay any decision for a while longer, according to a draft statement leaked ahead of the G-20’s conclusion.
Still, the battle lines in the stimulus-versus-austerity debate were clearly drawn among the 24 heads of state gathered in a heavily guarded convention hall lined by a moat. The conservative leaders of the United Kingdom, South Korea and Germany came out decisively for austerity, warning that budget cuts were crucial to restoring fiscal order and worldwide confidence.
“The countries in crisis will have to find measures that might be painful and politically unpopular in the short term, but nonetheless they must pursue this path,” South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said Monday.
On the other side were left-leaning governments such as those in Argentina, Brazil and France that have denounced the German-imposed austerity plan for struggling countries such as Spain and Greece and pushed for more stimulus spending.
After Argentine President Cristina Fernandez met with her Brazilian counterpart, Dilma Rousseff, the two sides were united in their opposition to the existing bailout plan.
“At the same time, they agree that we need to listen to Europe, especially to Germany, to see what measures it proposes to exit the euro crisis,” Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman said.
Mexican President Felipe Calderon said the summit ended with a signed document that included a comprehensive plan for the future but without details. The document had yet to be released.
European leaders plan to release a more complete response to the continent’s financial crisis during a summit at the end of June in Brussels.
President Barack Obama did not take a clear stand on the issue while speaking briefly to reporters Monday, pledging only to work “hand-in-hand to both grow the economy and create jobs while taking a responsible approach.”
The draft statement stopped short of committing the nations to greater spending unless conditions worsen. It urged fiscal responsibility while looking to education, innovation and infrastructure investment to spur economies.
Such fence-sitting is typical of G-20 declarations, said Jacob Kirkegaard, a research fellow at the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics.
“On the big issue of the hour, of weeks and months, the G-20 communique is not going to make a big difference,” Kirkegaard said. “The communique will repeat the mantra about strong, balanced, global growth. With each member state free to do whatever they want, that’s the way to paper over those differences.”
Indeed, the statement’s reassuring words failed to sooth troubled world stock markets, which remained mixed and nervous Tuesday.
Germany must shoulder a large share of the contributions to bail out economically weaker European countries that overspent for years. In exchange, Germany has been insisting on steep cutbacks from aid recipients such as Greece.
